When educators adhere rigidly to personal grading methods without flexibility, they are said to be:

When educators strictly apply their personal grading methods without allowing for any flexibility, they are exhibiting a behavior that can be described as grading by personal fetish. This term suggests that the instructor is prioritizing their own preferences or biases over the objective evaluation of students' performance. Such a rigid approach can hinder student learning and growth, as it may not take into account individual learning styles or the diverse needs of students.

In contrast, effective grading practices should be adaptable and consider various factors related to student progress and understanding, promoting a more equitable assessment environment. This method highlights the importance of flexibility and fairness in educational settings, where the goal is to support students’ learning rather than to impose a fixed standard based solely on the instructor's personal criteria.